Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 9749823a authored by /e/ robot's avatar /e/ robot
Browse files

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/lineage-17.1' into v1-q

parents de89b6ed d70c18ac
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+17 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -225,6 +225,23 @@
    -->
    <country iso="ba" allowed="true" />

    <!-- Enable recording for Bangladesh:
           Based on the Evidence Act of 1872, audio recordings may be admissible as a form of
           evidence. In civil cases, call recording may be used, but judges decide on when they are
           admissable. Recordings are considered admissible evidence when a witness is deposed and
           testifies to their validity before a court. Parties may rely on recordings during civil
           cases, in order to support their side's version of events. While the use of audio
           recordings as a form of evidence is common, the Supreme Court has not stated whether
           recordings can be used as evidence blindly, thus their use is on a case-to-case basis.

           Legal discussion:
             https://www.thedailystar.net/news/your-advocate-2

           Evidence Act of 1872:
             https://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/law/7e753733_a368_471e_aef9_b4525cb5082c/The_Evidence_Act,_1872_(Act_No._I_of_1872).pdf
    -->
    <country iso="bd" allowed="true" />

    <!-- Enable recording for Belgium:
         As stated in the official response below, Belgian law does not consider the recording of
         one's personal communications as a punishable offense. Using said recordings in a