Faster and simpler replace in SSB
The original method was adding a suspicious space that was eventually removed with a series of 3 calls to change. This should not be necessary. I have tested this with various gap positions and lengths, for all replace cases I could think of. The test can not be added to the CTS as it would need to expose the internal resizeFor and moveGapTo methods. Change-Id: I194457fbcfd758fa69a7f380665cfd5ae4d3f1d4
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment