Don't throw TransactionTooLargeException for small payloads
In practice, if we ever see an apparent transaction-too-large result with a modest-sized payload, it means that the remote process died at just the right time (with the binder transaction already in flight so it wasn't detected as a DEAD_OBJECT up front). Don't throw TransactionTooLargeException in this case, because we really do need to distinguish that from dead-remote more accurately. In particular, certain common execution patterns on existing hardware trigger this circumstance, and they wind up crashing the system. This is bad, so now we avoid it unless we're pretty sure that is really what happened. Bug 21801759 Change-Id: Id05f1eecc0d23dc8d0505c402e2cb68396782135
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment