Loading java/sdk_library.go +13 −5 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -201,8 +201,12 @@ func initApiScope(scope *apiScope) *apiScope { return scope } func (scope *apiScope) stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix() string { return ".stubs" + scope.moduleSuffix } func (scope *apiScope) stubsLibraryModuleName(baseName string) string { return baseName + ".stubs" + scope.moduleSuffix return baseName + scope.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix() } func (scope *apiScope) stubsSourceModuleName(baseName string) string { Loading Loading @@ -1684,16 +1688,20 @@ var _ sdkLibraryComponentNamingScheme = (*defaultNamingScheme)(nil) func moduleStubLinkType(name string) (stub bool, ret sdkLinkType) { // This suffix-based approach is fragile and could potentially mis-trigger. // TODO(b/155164730): Clean this up when modules no longer reference sdk_lib stubs directly. if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.public") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-publicapi") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopePublic.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { if name == "hwbinder.stubs" || name == "libcore_private.stubs" { // Due to a previous bug, these modules were not considered stubs, so we retain that. return false, javaPlatform } return true, javaSdk } if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.system") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-systemapi") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeSystem.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { return true, javaSystem } if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.module_lib") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-module_libs_api") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeModuleLib.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { return true, javaModule } if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.test") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeTest.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { return true, javaSystem } return false, javaPlatform Loading Loading
java/sdk_library.go +13 −5 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -201,8 +201,12 @@ func initApiScope(scope *apiScope) *apiScope { return scope } func (scope *apiScope) stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix() string { return ".stubs" + scope.moduleSuffix } func (scope *apiScope) stubsLibraryModuleName(baseName string) string { return baseName + ".stubs" + scope.moduleSuffix return baseName + scope.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix() } func (scope *apiScope) stubsSourceModuleName(baseName string) string { Loading Loading @@ -1684,16 +1688,20 @@ var _ sdkLibraryComponentNamingScheme = (*defaultNamingScheme)(nil) func moduleStubLinkType(name string) (stub bool, ret sdkLinkType) { // This suffix-based approach is fragile and could potentially mis-trigger. // TODO(b/155164730): Clean this up when modules no longer reference sdk_lib stubs directly. if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.public") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-publicapi") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopePublic.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { if name == "hwbinder.stubs" || name == "libcore_private.stubs" { // Due to a previous bug, these modules were not considered stubs, so we retain that. return false, javaPlatform } return true, javaSdk } if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.system") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-systemapi") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeSystem.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { return true, javaSystem } if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.module_lib") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-module_libs_api") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeModuleLib.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { return true, javaModule } if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.test") { if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeTest.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) { return true, javaSystem } return false, javaPlatform Loading