Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Skip to content
Commit 5ab7fa98 authored by Minchan Kim's avatar Minchan Kim Committed by Thierry Strudel
Browse files

BACKPORT: mm: /proc/pid/smaps:: show proportional swap share of the mapping



We want to know per-process workingset size for smart memory management
on userland and we use swap(ex, zram) heavily to maximize memory
efficiency so workingset includes swap as well as RSS.

On such system, if there are lots of shared anonymous pages, it's really
hard to figure out exactly how many each process consumes memory(ie, rss
+ wap) if the system has lots of shared anonymous memory(e.g, android).

This patch introduces SwapPss field on /proc/<pid>/smaps so we can get
more exact workingset size per process.

Bongkyu tested it. Result is below.

1. 50M used swap
SwapTotal: 461976 kB
SwapFree: 411192 kB

$ adb shell cat /proc/*/smaps | grep "SwapPss:" | awk '{sum += $2} END {print sum}';
48236
$ adb shell cat /proc/*/smaps | grep "Swap:" | awk '{sum += $2} END {print sum}';
141184

2. 240M used swap
SwapTotal: 461976 kB
SwapFree: 216808 kB

$ adb shell cat /proc/*/smaps | grep "SwapPss:" | awk '{sum += $2} END {print sum}';
230315
$ adb shell cat /proc/*/smaps | grep "Swap:" | awk '{sum += $2} END {print sum}';
1387744

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: simplify kunmap_atomic() call]
Signed-off-by: default avatarMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatarBongkyu Kim <bongkyu.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: default avatarBongkyu Kim <bongkyu.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Bug: 26190646
Change-Id: Idf92d682fdef432bdd66e530a7e7cdff8f375db1
Signed-off-by: default avatarThierry Strudel <tstrudel@google.com>
parent 214c1ada
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment