e1000e: fix the use of magic numbers for buffer overrun issue
commit c0f4b163a03e73055dd734eaca64b9580e72e7fb upstream.
This is a follow on to commit b10effb92e27 ("fix buffer overrun while the
 I219 is processing DMA transactions") to address David Laights concerns
about the use of "magic" numbers.  So define masks as well as add
additional code comments to give a better understanding of what needs to
be done to avoid a buffer overrun.
Signed-off-by:  Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:
Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:  Alexander H Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:
Alexander H Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:  Dima Ruinskiy <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:
Dima Ruinskiy <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:  Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
Tested-by:
Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
Tested-by:  Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by:
Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by:  Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by:
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by:  Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment
