Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Skip to content
Commit f4359ced authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede Committed by Jani Nikula
Browse files

drm/i915: Fix false-positive assert_rpm_wakelock_held in i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier v2



assert_rpm_wakelock_held is triggered from i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier
even though it gets unregistered on (runtime) suspend, this is caused
by a race happening under the following circumstances:

intel_runtime_pm_put does:

   atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);

   pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev);
   pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(kdev);

And pm_runtime_put_autosuspend calls intel_runtime_suspend from
a workqueue, so there is ample of time between the atomic_dec() and
intel_runtime_suspend() unregistering the notifier. If the notifier
gets called in this windowd assert_rpm_wakelock_held falsely triggers
(at this point we're not runtime-suspended yet).

This commit adds disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts and
enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts calls around the
intel_uncore_forcewake_get(FORCEWAKE_ALL) call in
i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier fixing the false-positive WARN_ON.

Changes in v2:
-Reword comment explaining why disabling the wakeref asserts is
 ok and necessary

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: default avatarFKr <bugs-freedesktop@ubermail.me>
Reviewed-by: default avatarImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171110150301.9601-2-hdegoede@redhat.com


(cherry picked from commit ce30560c)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
parent e8c49fa9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment