mm/madvise: pass task and mm to do_madvise

Patch series "introduce memory hinting API for external process", v7.

Now, we have MADV_PAGEOUT and MADV_COLD as madvise hinting API.  With
that, application could give hints to kernel what memory range are
preferred to be reclaimed.  However, in some platform(e.g., Android), the
information required to make the hinting decision is not known to the app.
Instead, it is known to a centralized userspace daemon(e.g.,
ActivityManagerService), and that daemon must be able to initiate reclaim
on its own without any app involvement.

To solve the concern, this patch introduces new syscall -
process_madvise(2).  Bascially, it's same with madvise(2) syscall but it
has some differences.

1. It needs pidfd of target process to provide the hint

2.  It supports only MADV_{COLD|PAGEOUT|MERGEABLE|UNMEREABLE} at this
   moment.  Other hints in madvise will be opened when there are explicit
   requests from community to prevent unexpected bugs we couldn't support.

3.  Only privileged processes can do something for other process's
   address space.

For more detail of the new API, please see "mm: introduce external memory
hinting API" description in this patchset.

This patch (of 7):

In upcoming patches, do_madvise will be called from external process
context so we shouldn't asssume "current" is always hinted process's
task_struct.

Furthermore, we must not access mm_struct via task->mm, but obtain it
via access_mm() once (in the following patch) and only use that pointer
[1], so pass it to do_madvise() as well.  Note the vma->vm_mm pointers
are safe, so we can use them further down the call stack.

And let's pass *current* and current->mm as arguments of do_madvise so
it shouldn't change existing behavior but prepare next patch to make
review easy.

Note: io_madvise passes NULL as target_task argument of do_madvise because
it couldn't know who is target.

[1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAG48ez27=pwm5m_N_988xT1huO7g7h6arTQL44zev6TD-h-7Tg@mail.gmail.com

[vbabka@suse.cz: changelog tweak]
[minchan@kernel.org: use current->mm for io_uring]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200423145215.72666-1-minchan@kernel.org
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix it for upstream changes]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: whoops]
[rdunlap@infradead.org: add missing includes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302193630.68771-2-minchan@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/madvise: introduce process_madvise() syscall: an external memory hinting API

There is usecase that System Management Software(SMS) want to give a
memory hint like MADV_[COLD|PAGEEOUT] to other processes and in the
case of Android, it is the ActivityManagerService.

The information required to make the reclaim decision is not known to
the app.  Instead, it is known to the centralized userspace
daemon(ActivityManagerService), and that daemon must be able to
initiate reclaim on its own without any app involvement.

To solve the issue, this patch introduces a new syscall
process_madvise(2).  It uses pidfd of an external process to give the
hint.

 int process_madvise(int pidfd, void *addr, size_t length, int advice,
			unsigned long flags);

Since it could affect other process's address range, only privileged
process(CAP_SYS_PTRACE) or something else(e.g., being the same UID)
gives it the right to ptrace the process could use it successfully.
The flag argument is reserved for future use if we need to extend the
API.

I think supporting all hints madvise has/will supported/support to
process_madvise is rather risky.  Because we are not sure all hints
make sense from external process and implementation for the hint may
rely on the caller being in the current context so it could be
error-prone.  Thus, I just limited hints as MADV_[COLD|PAGEOUT] in this
patch.

If someone want to add other hints, we could hear hear the usecase and
review it for each hint.  It's safer for maintenance rather than
introducing a buggy syscall but hard to fix it later.

Q.1 - Why does any external entity have better knowledge?

Quote from Sandeep

"For Android, every application (including the special SystemServer)
are forked from Zygote.  The reason of course is to share as many
libraries and classes between the two as possible to benefit from the
preloading during boot.

After applications start, (almost) all of the APIs end up calling into
this SystemServer process over IPC (binder) and back to the
application.

In a fully running system, the SystemServer monitors every single
process periodically to calculate their PSS / RSS and also decides
which process is "important" to the user for interactivity.

So, because of how these processes start _and_ the fact that the
SystemServer is looping to monitor each process, it does tend to *know*
which address range of the application is not used / useful.

Besides, we can never rely on applications to clean things up
themselves.  We've had the "hey app1, the system is low on memory,
please trim your memory usage down" notifications for a long time[1].
They rely on applications honoring the broadcasts and very few do.

So, if we want to avoid the inevitable killing of the application and
restarting it, some way to be able to tell the OS about unimportant
memory in these applications will be useful.

- ssp

Q.2 - How to guarantee the race(i.e., object validation) between when
giving a hint from an external process and get the hint from the target
process?

process_madvise operates on the target process's address space as it
exists at the instant that process_madvise is called.  If the space
target process can run between the time the process_madvise process
inspects the target process address space and the time that
process_madvise is actually called, process_madvise may operate on
memory regions that the calling process does not expect.  It's the
responsibility of the process calling process_madvise to close this
race condition.  For example, the calling process can suspend the
target process with ptrace, SIGSTOP, or the freezer cgroup so that it
doesn't have an opportunity to change its own address space before
process_madvise is called.  Another option is to operate on memory
regions that the caller knows a priori will be unchanged in the target
process.  Yet another option is to accept the race for certain
process_madvise calls after reasoning that mistargeting will do no
harm.  The suggested API itself does not provide synchronization.  It
also apply other APIs like move_pages, process_vm_write.

The race isn't really a problem though.  Why is it so wrong to require
that callers do their own synchronization in some manner?  Nobody
objects to write(2) merely because it's possible for two processes to
open the same file and clobber each other's writes --- instead, we tell
people to use flock or something.  Think about mmap.  It never
guarantees newly allocated address space is still valid when the user
tries to access it because other threads could unmap the memory right
before.  That's where we need synchronization by using other API or
design from userside.  It shouldn't be part of API itself.  If someone
needs more fine-grained synchronization rather than process level,
there were two ideas suggested - cookie[2] and anon-fd[3].  Both are
applicable via using last reserved argument of the API but I don't
think it's necessary right now since we have already ways to prevent
the race so don't want to add additional complexity with more
fine-grained optimization model.

To make the API extend, it reserved an unsigned long as last argument
so we could support it in future if someone really needs it.

Q.3 - Why doesn't ptrace work?

Injecting an madvise in the target process using ptrace would not work
for us because such injected madvise would have to be executed by the
target process, which means that process would have to be runnable and
that creates the risk of the abovementioned race and hinting a wrong
VMA.  Furthermore, we want to act the hint in caller's context, not the
callee's, because the callee is usually limited in cpuset/cgroups or
even freezed state so they can't act by themselves quick enough, which
causes more thrashing/kill.  It doesn't work if the target process are
ptraced(e.g., strace, debugger, minidump) because a process can have at
most one ptracer.

[1] https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory"

[2] process_getinfo for getting the cookie which is updated whenever
    vma of process address layout are changed - Daniel Colascione -
    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190520035254.57579-1-minchan@kernel.org/T/#m7694416fd179b2066a2c62b5b139b14e3894e224

[3] anonymous fd which is used for the object(i.e., address range)
    validation - Michal Hocko -
    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200120112722.GY18451@dhcp22.suse.cz/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302193630.68771-3-minchan@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200508183320.GA125527@google.com


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: fix process_madvise build break for arm64

0-day reported build break from process_madvise on ARM64.

   aarch64-linux-ld: arch/arm64/kernel/head.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against `_kernel_offset_le_lo32' can not be used when making a shared object
   aarch64-linux-ld: arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.stub.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against `__efistub_stext_offset' can not be used when making a shared object
   arch/arm64/kernel/head.o: In function `kimage_vaddr':
   (.idmap.text+0x0): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
   arch/arm64/kernel/head.o: In function `__primary_switch':
   (.idmap.text+0x378): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
   (.idmap.text+0x380): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
>> arch/arm64/kernel/sys32.o:(.rodata+0xdb8): undefined reference to `__arm64_process_madvise'

This patch should fix it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200303145756.GA219683@google.com


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm: fix build error for mips of process_madvise

kbuild test rebot reported build break of process_madvise for mips[1].
This patch should fix it.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202005080716.cUcbCQ3i%25lkp@intel.com/
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200508052517.GA197378@google.com


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: mm-introduce-external-memory-hinting-api-fix-2-fix

the compat bit comes later

Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/madvise: check fatal signal pending of target process

Bail out to prevent unnecessary CPU overhead if target process has pending
fatal signal during (MADV_COLD|MADV_PAGEOUT) operation.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302193630.68771-4-minchan@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: pid: move pidfd_get_pid() to pid.c

process_madvise syscall needs pidfd_get_pid function to translate pidfd to
pid so this patch move the function to kernel/pid.c.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302193630.68771-5-minchan@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Suggested-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/madvise: support both pid and pidfd for process_madvise

There is a demand[1] to support pid as well pidfd for process_madvise
to reduce unnecessary syscall to get pidfd if the user has control of
the target process (ie, they could guarantee the process is not gone or
pid is not reused).

This patch aims for supporting both options like waitid(2).  So, the
syscall is currently,

        int process_madvise(idtype_t idtype, id_t id, void *addr,
                size_t length, int advice, unsigned long flags);

@which is actually idtype_t for userspace library and currently, it
supports P_PID and P_PIDFD.

[1]  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/9d849087-3359-c4ab-fbec-859e8186c509@virtuozzo.com/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302193630.68771-6-minchan@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/madvise: allow KSM hints for remote API

It all began with the fact that KSM works only on memory that is marked by
madvise().  And the only way to get around that is to either:

  * use LD_PRELOAD; or
  * patch the kernel with something like UKSM or PKSM.

(i skip ptrace can of worms here intentionally)

To overcome this restriction, lets employ a new remote madvise API.  This
can be used by some small userspace helper daemon that will do auto-KSM
job for us.

I think of two major consumers of remote KSM hints:

  * hosts, that run containers, especially similar ones and especially in
    a trusted environment, sharing the same runtime like Node.js;

  * heavy applications, that can be run in multiple instances, not
    limited to opensource ones like Firefox, but also those that cannot be
    modified since they are binary-only and, maybe, statically linked.

Speaking of statistics, more numbers can be found in the very first
submission, that is related to this one [1].  For my current setup with
two Firefox instances I get 100 to 200 MiB saved for the second instance
depending on the amount of tabs.

1 FF instance with 15 tabs:

   $ echo "$(cat /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/pages_sharing) * 4 / 1024" | bc
   410

2 FF instances, second one has 12 tabs (all the tabs are different):

   $ echo "$(cat /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/pages_sharing) * 4 / 1024" | bc
   592

At the very moment I do not have specific numbers for containerised
workload, but those should be comparable in case the containers share
similar/same runtime.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1012142/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302193630.68771-8-minchan@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm: support vector address ranges for process_madvise

This patch extends a) process_madvise(2) support vector address ranges in
a system call and then b) support the vector address ranges to local
process as well as external process.

Android app has thousands of vmas due to zygote so it's totally waste of
CPU and power if we should call the syscall one by one for each vma.
(With testing 2000-vma syscall vs 1-vector syscall, it showed 15%
performance improvement.  I think it would be bigger in real practice
because the testing ran very cache friendly environment).

Another potential use case for the vector range is to amortize the cost of
TLB shootdowns for multiple ranges when using MADV_DONTNEED; this could
benefit users like TCP receive zerocopy and malloc implementations.  In
future, we could find more usecases for other advises so let's make it
happens as API since we introduce a new syscall at this moment.  With
that, existing madvise(2) user could replace it with process_madvise(2)
with their own pid if they want to have batch address ranges support
feature.

So finally, the API is as follows,

  ssize_t process_madvise(idtype_t idtype, id_t id,
		const struct iovec *iovec, unsigned long vlen,
                int advice, unsigned long flags);

DESCRIPTION
  The process_madvise() system call is used to give advice or directions
  to the kernel about the address ranges from external process as well as
  local process. It provides the advice to address ranges of process
  described by iovec and vlen. The goal of such advice is to improve system
  or application performance.

  The idtype and id arguments select the target process to be advised as
  follows:

    idtype == P_PID
      select the process whose process ID matches id

    idtype == P_PIDFD
      select the process referred to by the PID file descriptor
      specified in id. (See pidofd_open(2) for further information)

  The pointer iovec points to an array of iovec structures, defined in
  <sys/uio.h> as:

    struct iovec {
    	void *iov_base;		/* starting address */
	size_t iov_len;		/* number of bytes to be advised */
    };

  The iovec describes address ranges beginning at address(iov_base)
  and with size length of bytes(iov_len).

  The vlen represents the number of elements in iovec.

  The advice is indicated in the advice argument, which is one of the
  following at this moment if the target process specified by idtype and
  id is external.

    MADV_COLD
    MADV_PAGEOUT
    MADV_MERGEABLE
    MADV_UNMERGEABLE

  Permission to provide a hint to external process is governed by a
  ptrace access mode PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS check; see ptrace(2).

  The process_madvise supports every advice madvise(2) has if target
  process is in same thread group with calling process so user could
  use process_madvise(2) to extend existing madvise(2) to support
  vector address ranges.

RETURN VALUE
  On success, process_madvise() returns the number of bytes advised.
  This return value may be less than the total number of requested
  bytes, if an error occurred. The caller should check return value
  to determine whether a partial advice occurred.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200423145215.72666-2-minchan@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm: support compat_sys_process_madvise

This patch supports compat syscall for process_madvise

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200423195835.GA46847@google.com


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix

fix process_madvise prototype

Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
From: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Subject: mm/madvise: make function 'do_process_madvise' static

Fix sparse warnings:

mm/madvise.c:1233:9: warning: symbol 'do_process_madvise' was not declared. Should it be static?

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200429014030.41147-1-zhengbin13@huawei.com


Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm: fix s390 compat build error

Nathan reported build error with sys_compat_process_madvise.
This patch should fix it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200429012421.GA132200@google.com


Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>	[build]
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix

add compat_sys_process_madvise to mips syscall table

Conflicts:
	fs/io_uring.c
	mm/madvise.c

Change-Id: I89b92904043c6d7fbf9747746d20b823dbc20410
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Git-commit: 82f576dd0298d675df9b19ac0638d79b5ca79e59
Git-Repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git


[charante@codeaurora.org: Fixed merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>