Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Skip to content
Commit 3a5f45a4 authored by Yu Kuai's avatar Yu Kuai Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()



[ Upstream commit 42c306ed723321af4003b2a41bb73728cab54f85 ]

Consider the following scenario:

    Process 1       Process 2       Process 3       Process 4
     (BIC1)          (BIC2)          (BIC3)          (BIC4)
      Λ               |               |                |
       \-------------\ \-------------\ \--------------\|
                      V               V                V
      bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4
ref    0              1               2                4

If Process 1 issue a new IO and bfqq2 is found, and then bfq_init_rq()
decide to spilt bfqq2 by bfq_split_bfqq(). Howerver, procress reference
of bfqq2 is 1 and bfq_split_bfqq() just clear the coop flag, which will
break the merge chain.

Expected result: caller will allocate a new bfqq for BIC1

    Process 1       Process 2       Process 3       Process 4
     (BIC1)          (BIC2)          (BIC3)          (BIC4)
                      |               |                |
                       \-------------\ \--------------\|
                                      V                V
      bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4
ref    0              0               1                3

Since the condition is only used for the last bfqq4 when the previous
bfqq2 and bfqq3 are already splited. Fix the problem by checking if
bfqq is the last one in the merge chain as well.

Fixes: 36eca894 ("block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM)")
Signed-off-by: default avatarYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240902130329.3787024-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent 140c8e2c
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment