Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Skip to content
Commit fb9de970 authored by Michael S. Tsirkin's avatar Michael S. Tsirkin
Browse files

ptr_ring: batch ring zeroing



A known weakness in ptr_ring design is that it does not handle well the
situation when ring is almost full: as entries are consumed they are
immediately used again by the producer, so consumer and producer are
writing to a shared cache line.

To fix this, add batching to consume calls: as entries are
consumed do not write NULL into the ring until we get
a multiple (in current implementation 2x) of cache lines
away from the producer. At that point, write them all out.

We do the write out in the reverse order to keep
producer from sharing cache with consumer for as long
as possible.

Writeout also triggers when ring wraps around - there's
no special reason to do this but it helps keep the code
a bit simpler.

What should we do if getting away from producer by 2 cache lines
would mean we are keeping the ring moe than half empty?
Maybe we should reduce the batching in this case,
current patch simply reduces the batching.

Notes:
- it is no longer true that a call to consume guarantees
  that the following call to produce will succeed.
  No users seem to assume that.
- batching can also in theory reduce the signalling rate:
  users that would previously send interrups to the producer
  to wake it up after consuming each entry would now only
  need to do this once in a batch.
  Doing this would be easy by returning a flag to the caller.
  No users seem to do signalling on consume yet so this was not
  implemented yet.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
parent 9ea762a5
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment