BACKPORT: blk-mq: fix is_flush_rq
is_flush_rq() is called from bt_iter()/bt_tags_iter(), and runs the following check: hctx->fq->flush_rq == req but the passed hctx from bt_iter()/bt_tags_iter() may be NULL because: 1) memory re-order in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(): rq->mq_hctx = data->hctx; ... refcount_set(&rq->ref, 1); OR 2) tag re-use and ->rqs[] isn't updated with new request. Fix the issue by re-writing is_flush_rq() as: return rq->end_io == flush_end_io; which turns out simpler to follow and immune to data race since we have ordered WRITE rq->end_io and refcount_set(&rq->ref, 1). Fixes: 2e315dc07df0 ("blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter") Cc: "Blank-Burian, Markus, Dr." <blankburian@uni-muenster.de> Cc: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>.> Bug: 197804811 Change-Id: I4c19fc2c7d39235b0e95a622f26646a353a19ee9 [Upstream: cherry picked from commit a9ed27a764156929efe714033edb3e9023c5f321] [Pradeep: Resolved conflicts in block/blk.h] Signed-off-by:
Pradeep P V K <pragalla@codeaurora.org> Git-commit: ec1b6ab9fe80cf689780c9ee3b2cdb04cc11895e Git-repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/ Signed-off-by:
Pradeep P V K <quic_pragalla@quicinc.com>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment