Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 12d183ff authored by Hansong Zhang's avatar Hansong Zhang
Browse files

Remove unused log to improve readability 

Bug: 159815595
Tag: #refactor
Test: compile & verify basic functions working
Change-Id: I1ab7ef85730f6d5c857f12c1bf54db1d17d503d2
parent d81a2e3e

system/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc

+0 −12
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1403,18 +1403,6 @@ static bool btm_sec_is_upgrade_possible(tBTM_SEC_DEV_REC* p_dev_rec, 


  if (p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_KNOWN) {

    is_possible = false;

    if (p_dev_rec->p_cur_service) {

      BTM_TRACE_DEBUG(

          "%s() id: %d, link_key_typet: %d, rmt_io_caps: %d, chk flags: 0x%x, "

          "flags: 0x%x",

          __func__, p_dev_rec->p_cur_service->service_id,

          p_dev_rec->link_key_type, p_dev_rec->rmt_io_caps, mtm_check,

          p_dev_rec->p_cur_service->security_flags);

    } else {

      BTM_TRACE_DEBUG(

          "%s() link_key_typet: %d, rmt_io_caps: %d, chk flags: 0x%x", __func__,

          p_dev_rec->link_key_type, p_dev_rec->rmt_io_caps, mtm_check);

    }

    /* Already have a link key to the connected peer. Is the link key secure

     *enough?

     ** Is a link key upgrade even possible?