[CS8] Add explanations

                || (consideredWord.length() > 1 && !didRemoveTypedWord);

        final boolean hasAutoCorrection;

        // TODO: using isCorrectionEnabled here is not very good. It's probably useless, because

        // any attempt to do auto-correction is already shielded with a test for this flag; at the

        // same time, it feels wrong that the SuggestedWord object includes information about

        // the current settings. It may also be useful to know, when the setting is off, whether

        // the word *would* have been auto-corrected.

        if (!isCorrectionEnabled || !allowsToBeAutoCorrected || resultsArePredictions

                || suggestionResults.isEmpty() || wordComposer.hasDigits()

                || wordComposer.isMostlyCaps() || wordComposer.isResumed()

        // If correction is not enabled, we never auto-correct. This is for example for when

        // the setting "Auto-correction" is "off": we still suggest, but we don't auto-correct.

        if (!isCorrectionEnabled

                // If the word does not allow to be auto-corrected, then we don't auto-correct.

                || !allowsToBeAutoCorrected

                // If we are doing prediction, then we never auto-correct of course

                || resultsArePredictions

                // If we don't have suggestion results, we can't evaluate the first suggestion

                // for auto-correction

                || suggestionResults.isEmpty()

                // If the word has digits, we never auto-correct because it's likely the word

                // was type with a lot of care

                || wordComposer.hasDigits()

                // If the word is mostly caps, we never auto-correct because this is almost

                // certainly intentional (and careful input)

                || wordComposer.isMostlyCaps()

                // We never auto-correct when suggestions are resumed because it would be unexpected

                || wordComposer.isResumed()

                // If we don't have a main dictionary, we never want to auto-correct. The reason

                // for this is, the user may have a contact whose name happens to match a valid

                // word in their language, and it will unexpectedly auto-correct. For example, if

                // the user types in English with no dictionary and has a "Will" in their contact

                // list, "will" would always auto-correct to "Will" which is unwanted. Hence, no

                // main dict => no auto-correct. Also, it would probably get obnoxious quickly.

                // TODO: now that we have personalization, we may want to re-evaluate this decision

                || !mDictionaryFacilitator.hasAtLeastOneInitializedMainDictionary()

                || suggestionResults.first().isKindOf(SuggestedWordInfo.KIND_SHORTCUT)) {

            // If we don't have a main dictionary, we never want to auto-correct. The reason for

            // this is, the user may have a contact whose name happens to match a valid word in

            // their language, and it will unexpectedly auto-correct. For example, if the user

            // types in English with no dictionary and has a "Will" in their contact list, "will"

            // would always auto-correct to "Will" which is unwanted. Hence, no main dict => no

            // auto-correct.

            // Also, shortcuts should never auto-correct unless they are whitelist entries.

                // If the first suggestion is a shortcut we never auto-correct to it, regardless

                // of how strong it is (whitelist entries are not KIND_SHORTCUT but KIND_WHITELIST).

                // TODO: we may want to have shortcut-only entries auto-correct in the future.

                || suggestionResults.first().isKindOf(SuggestedWordInfo.KIND_SHORTCUT)) {

            hasAutoCorrection = false;

        } else {

            final SuggestedWordInfo firstSuggestion = suggestionResults.first();