Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Skip to content
Commit 906497c5 authored by Dianne Hackborn's avatar Dianne Hackborn
Browse files

Hopefully fix issue #2662536: Why is launcher being killed?

It looks like there was a subtle bug where Process.setOomAdj() could
return false just because the given process doesn't exist, even though
it is documented to only return false if OOM killing is not supported
at all.  This would cause the activity manager to fall into its code
path of trying to clean up processes itself, which it does a much
poorer problem at.  I am thinking we may be seeing this problem more
now that the activity manager is killing background processes itself
when there are too many of them.

In addition, this change cleans up and reduces some of the logging
around killing processes.

Finally, try to improve process LRU management a bit by taking
into account process dependencies.  Any dependent processes are
pulled up in the LRU list with the processes that is actually
moving.  Also, we bring a process up if someone accesses its content
provider.

Change-Id: I34ea161f839679345578ffe681e8d9c5d26ab948
parent 639a7fc2
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment