Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 4ab85f3d authored by Mady Mellor's avatar Mady Mellor
Browse files

Fix misplaced surface from fold -> unfold while bubbles are expanded

This also fixes the surface being misplaced when the theme changes.

When setBounds is called in TaskViewTransitions we were skipping
creating a new transition whenever there was anything pending.

Instead, we should only skip if the pending in flight is for that
task view AND an opening type transit, otherwise the bounds never
get updated until the next open / if a bounds change is sent without
any other pending.

Test: manual - have an expanded bubble on folded device, unfold
             => ensure the expanded view is fully visible
             - have an expanded bubble & change the theme via QS
             => ensure the expanded view is properly placed
             - test various bubble animations: expand, collapse,
               switch, new bubble, dismissing while expanded, rotation
               and ensure they all look fine.
Test: atest TaskViewTransitionTest
Bug: 281855397
Bug: 280440749
Change-Id: I43cbb90bdfbe90bf068c5de21d060193aa38c96f
parent 207bc54d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+32 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -134,6 +134,21 @@ public class TaskViewTransitions implements Transitions.TransitionHandler {
        return null;
    }

    /**
     * Looks through the pending transitions for a opening transaction that matches the provided
     * `taskView`.
     * @param taskView the pending transition should be for this.
     */
    private PendingTransition findPendingOpeningTransition(TaskViewTaskController taskView) {
        for (int i = mPending.size() - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
            if (mPending.get(i).mTaskView != taskView) continue;
            if (TransitionUtil.isOpeningType(mPending.get(i).mType)) {
                return mPending.get(i);
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    /**
     * Looks through the pending transitions for one matching `taskView`.
     * @param taskView the pending transition should be for this.
@@ -149,6 +164,19 @@ public class TaskViewTransitions implements Transitions.TransitionHandler {
        return null;
    }

    /**
     * Returns all the pending transitions for a given `taskView`.
     * @param taskView the pending transition should be for this.
     */
    ArrayList<PendingTransition> findAllPending(TaskViewTaskController taskView) {
        ArrayList<PendingTransition> list = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = mPending.size() - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
            if (mPending.get(i).mTaskView != taskView) continue;
            list.add(mPending.get(i));
        }
        return list;
    }

    private PendingTransition findPending(IBinder claimed) {
        for (int i = 0; i < mPending.size(); ++i) {
            if (mPending.get(i).mClaimed != claimed) continue;
@@ -249,9 +277,10 @@ public class TaskViewTransitions implements Transitions.TransitionHandler {
            // Task view isn't visible, the bounds will next visibility update.
            return;
        }
        if (hasPending()) {
            // There is already a transition in-flight, the window bounds will be set in
            // prepareOpenAnimation.
        PendingTransition pendingOpen = findPendingOpeningTransition(taskView);
        if (pendingOpen != null) {
            // There is already an opening transition in-flight, the window bounds will be
            // set in prepareOpenAnimation (via the window crop) if needed.
            return;
        }
        WindowContainerTransaction wct = new WindowContainerTransaction();
+99 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.MockitoAnnotations;

import java.util.List;

@SmallTest
@RunWith(AndroidTestingRunner.class)
@TestableLooper.RunWithLooper(setAsMainLooper = true)
@@ -58,6 +60,12 @@ public class TaskViewTransitionsTest extends ShellTestCase {
    ActivityManager.RunningTaskInfo mTaskInfo;
    @Mock
    WindowContainerToken mToken;
    @Mock
    TaskViewTaskController mTaskViewTaskController2;
    @Mock
    ActivityManager.RunningTaskInfo mTaskInfo2;
    @Mock
    WindowContainerToken mToken2;

    TaskViewTransitions mTaskViewTransitions;

@@ -73,10 +81,16 @@ public class TaskViewTransitionsTest extends ShellTestCase {
        mTaskInfo.token = mToken;
        mTaskInfo.taskId = 314;
        mTaskInfo.taskDescription = mock(ActivityManager.TaskDescription.class);
        when(mTaskViewTaskController.getTaskInfo()).thenReturn(mTaskInfo);

        mTaskInfo2 = new ActivityManager.RunningTaskInfo();
        mTaskInfo2.token = mToken2;
        mTaskInfo2.taskId = 315;
        mTaskInfo2.taskDescription = mock(ActivityManager.TaskDescription.class);
        when(mTaskViewTaskController2.getTaskInfo()).thenReturn(mTaskInfo2);

        mTaskViewTransitions = spy(new TaskViewTransitions(mTransitions));
        mTaskViewTransitions.addTaskView(mTaskViewTaskController);
        when(mTaskViewTaskController.getTaskInfo()).thenReturn(mTaskInfo);
    }

    @Test
@@ -119,7 +133,7 @@ public class TaskViewTransitionsTest extends ShellTestCase {
    }

    @Test
    public void testSetTaskBounds_taskVisibleWithPending_noTransaction() {
    public void testSetTaskBounds_taskVisibleWithPendingOpen_noTransaction() {
        assumeTrue(Transitions.ENABLE_SHELL_TRANSITIONS);

        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskViewVisible(mTaskViewTaskController, true);
@@ -134,6 +148,43 @@ public class TaskViewTransitionsTest extends ShellTestCase {
                .isNull();
    }

    @Test
    public void testSetTaskBounds_taskVisibleWithPendingChange_transition() {
        assumeTrue(Transitions.ENABLE_SHELL_TRANSITIONS);

        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskViewVisible(mTaskViewTaskController, true);

        // Consume the pending transition from visibility change
        TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition pending =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_TO_FRONT);
        assertThat(pending).isNotNull();
        mTaskViewTransitions.startAnimation(pending.mClaimed,
                mock(TransitionInfo.class),
                new SurfaceControl.Transaction(),
                new SurfaceControl.Transaction(),
                mock(Transitions.TransitionFinishCallback.class));
        // Verify it was consumed
        TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition checkPending =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_TO_FRONT);
        assertThat(checkPending).isNull();

        // Test that set bounds creates a new transition
        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskBounds(mTaskViewTaskController,
                new Rect(0, 0, 100, 100));
        assertThat(mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_CHANGE))
                .isNotNull();

        // Test that set bounds again (with different bounds) creates another transition
        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskBounds(mTaskViewTaskController,
                new Rect(0, 0, 300, 200));
        List<TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition> pendingList =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findAllPending(mTaskViewTaskController)
                        .stream()
                        .filter(pendingTransition -> pendingTransition.mType == TRANSIT_CHANGE)
                        .toList();
        assertThat(pendingList.size()).isEqualTo(2);
    }

    @Test
    public void testSetTaskBounds_sameBounds_noTransaction() {
        assumeTrue(Transitions.ENABLE_SHELL_TRANSITIONS);
@@ -161,6 +212,16 @@ public class TaskViewTransitionsTest extends ShellTestCase {
                mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_CHANGE);
        assertThat(pendingBounds).isNotNull();

        // Test that setting same bounds with in-flight transition doesn't cause another one
        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskBounds(mTaskViewTaskController,
                new Rect(0, 0, 100, 100));
        List<TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition> pendingList =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findAllPending(mTaskViewTaskController)
                        .stream()
                        .filter(pendingTransition -> pendingTransition.mType == TRANSIT_CHANGE)
                        .toList();
        assertThat(pendingList.size()).isEqualTo(1);

        // Consume the pending bounds transaction
        mTaskViewTransitions.startAnimation(pendingBounds.mClaimed,
                mock(TransitionInfo.class),
@@ -180,6 +241,42 @@ public class TaskViewTransitionsTest extends ShellTestCase {
        assertThat(pendingBounds2).isNull();
    }


    @Test
    public void testSetTaskBounds_taskVisibleWithDifferentTaskViewPendingChange_transition() {
        assumeTrue(Transitions.ENABLE_SHELL_TRANSITIONS);

        mTaskViewTransitions.addTaskView(mTaskViewTaskController2);

        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskViewVisible(mTaskViewTaskController, true);

        // Consume the pending transition from visibility change
        TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition pending =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_TO_FRONT);
        assertThat(pending).isNotNull();
        mTaskViewTransitions.startAnimation(pending.mClaimed,
                mock(TransitionInfo.class),
                new SurfaceControl.Transaction(),
                new SurfaceControl.Transaction(),
                mock(Transitions.TransitionFinishCallback.class));
        // Verify it was consumed
        TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition checkPending =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_TO_FRONT);
        assertThat(checkPending).isNull();

        // Set the second taskview as visible & check that it has a pending transition
        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskViewVisible(mTaskViewTaskController2, true);
        TaskViewTransitions.PendingTransition pending2 =
                mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController2, TRANSIT_TO_FRONT);
        assertThat(pending2).isNotNull();

        // Test that set bounds on the first taskview will create a new transition
        mTaskViewTransitions.setTaskBounds(mTaskViewTaskController,
                new Rect(0, 0, 100, 100));
        assertThat(mTaskViewTransitions.findPending(mTaskViewTaskController, TRANSIT_CHANGE))
                .isNotNull();
    }

    @Test
    public void testSetTaskVisibility_taskRemoved_noNPE() {
        mTaskViewTransitions.removeTaskView(mTaskViewTaskController);