Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 32e6d464 authored by Jordan Liu's avatar Jordan Liu
Browse files

Fix mLteSignalStrength range check

The previous check is wrong based on the spec, and does not match the
HAL definition either.

Change-Id: Idb1c209f11a76421d477f8a1d270e23d86d621b1
Fixes: 74026897
Test: manual
parent 439286d1
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+2 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -906,11 +906,8 @@ public class SignalStrength implements Parcelable {

        if (rsrpIconLevel != -1) return rsrpIconLevel;

        /* Valid values are (0-63, 99) as defined in TS 36.331 */
        // TODO the range here is probably supposed to be (0..31, 99). It's unclear if anyone relies
        // on the current incorrect range check, so this will be fixed in a future release with more
        // soak time
        if (mLteSignalStrength > 63) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
        /* Valid values are (0-31, 99) as defined in TS 27.007 8.5 */
        if (mLteSignalStrength > 31) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
        else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 12) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_GREAT;
        else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 8) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_GOOD;
        else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 5) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_MODERATE;