Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 02ea80b1 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

bpf: add various verifier test cases for self-tests



Add a couple of test cases, for example, probing for xadd on a spilled
pointer to packet and map_value_adj register, various other map_value_adj
tests including the unaligned load/store, and trying out pointer arithmetic
on map_value_adj register itself. For the unaligned load/store, we need
to figure out whether the architecture has efficient unaligned access and
need to mark affected tests accordingly.

Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 79adffcd
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -168,6 +168,16 @@
		.off   = OFF,					\
		.imm   = 0 })

/* Atomic memory add, *(uint *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */

#define BPF_STX_XADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF)			\
	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
		.code  = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_XADD,	\
		.dst_reg = DST,					\
		.src_reg = SRC,					\
		.off   = OFF,					\
		.imm   = 0 })

/* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */

#define BPF_ST_MEM(SIZE, DST, OFF, IMM)				\
+8 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
LIBDIR := ../../../lib
BPFDIR := $(LIBDIR)/bpf
APIDIR := ../../../include/uapi
GENDIR := ../../../../include/generated
GENHDR := $(GENDIR)/autoconf.h

CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I../../../include/uapi -I$(LIBDIR)
ifneq ($(wildcard $(GENHDR)),)
  GENFLAGS := -DHAVE_GENHDR
endif

CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(GENDIR) $(GENFLAGS)
LDLIBS += -lcap

TEST_GEN_PROGS = test_verifier test_tag test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map
+265 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -30,6 +30,14 @@

#include <bpf/bpf.h>

#ifdef HAVE_GENHDR
# include "autoconf.h"
#else
# if defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64) || defined(__s390x__) || defined(__aarch64__)
#  define CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS 1
# endif
#endif

#include "../../../include/linux/filter.h"

#ifndef ARRAY_SIZE
@@ -39,6 +47,8 @@
#define MAX_INSNS	512
#define MAX_FIXUPS	8

#define F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS	(1 << 0)

struct bpf_test {
	const char *descr;
	struct bpf_insn	insns[MAX_INSNS];
@@ -53,6 +63,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
		REJECT
	} result, result_unpriv;
	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
	uint8_t flags;
};

/* Note we want this to be 64 bit aligned so that the end of our array is
@@ -2431,6 +2442,30 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
	},
	{
		"direct packet access: test15 (spill with xadd)",
		.insns = {
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 8),
			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 4096),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, -8),
			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 0),
			BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_4, 0),
			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_5, 0),
			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.result = REJECT,
		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
	},
	{
		"helper access to packet: test1, valid packet_ptr range",
		.insns = {
@@ -2934,6 +2969,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"valid map access into an array with a variable",
@@ -2957,6 +2993,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"valid map access into an array with a signed variable",
@@ -2984,6 +3021,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"invalid map access into an array with a constant",
@@ -3025,6 +3063,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"invalid map access into an array with a variable",
@@ -3048,6 +3087,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"invalid map access into an array with no floor check",
@@ -3074,6 +3114,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"invalid map access into an array with a invalid max check",
@@ -3100,6 +3141,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"invalid map access into an array with a invalid max check",
@@ -3129,6 +3171,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.result = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"multiple registers share map_lookup_elem result",
@@ -3252,6 +3295,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.result = REJECT,
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"constant register |= constant should keep constant type",
@@ -3981,7 +4025,208 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value (adjusted) is preserved across register spilling",
		"map element value or null is marked on register spilling",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -152),
			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 42),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value store of cleared call register",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R1 !read_ok",
		.errstr = "R1 !read_ok",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value with unaligned store",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 17),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 3),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 42),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 2, 43),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, -2, 44),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, 0, 32),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, 2, 33),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, -2, 34),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_8, 5),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, 0, 22),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, 4, 23),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, -7, 24),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, 3),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, 0, 22),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, 4, 23),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, -4, 24),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"map element value with unaligned load",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 11),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, MAX_ENTRIES, 9),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 3),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0, 2),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, 0),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, 2),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 5),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0, 4),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"map element value illegal alu op, 1",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value illegal alu op, 2",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value illegal alu op, 3",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, 42),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value illegal alu op, 4",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
			BPF_ENDIAN(BPF_FROM_BE, BPF_REG_0, 64),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value illegal alu op, 5",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 4096),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"map element value is preserved across register spilling",
		.insns = {
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
@@ -4003,6 +4248,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"helper access to variable memory: stack, bitwise AND + JMP, correct bounds",
@@ -4441,6 +4687,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	},
	{
		"invalid range check",
@@ -4472,6 +4719,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
	}
};

@@ -4550,11 +4798,11 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog,
static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
			   int *passes, int *errors)
{
	int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment;
	struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns;
	int prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog);
	int prog_type = test->prog_type;
	int fd_f1 = -1, fd_f2 = -1, fd_f3 = -1;
	int fd_prog, expected_ret;
	const char *expected_err;

	do_test_fixup(test, prog, &fd_f1, &fd_f2, &fd_f3);
@@ -4567,8 +4815,19 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
		       test->result_unpriv : test->result;
	expected_err = unpriv && test->errstr_unpriv ?
		       test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr;

	reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
				(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
				strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
	if (reject_from_alignment) {
		printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
		       strerror(errno));
		goto fail_log;
	}
#endif
	if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) {
		if (fd_prog < 0) {
		if (fd_prog < 0 && !reject_from_alignment) {
			printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n",
			       strerror(errno));
			goto fail_log;
@@ -4578,14 +4837,15 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
			printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n");
			goto fail_log;
		}
		if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) {
		if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err) && !reject_from_alignment) {
			printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n");
			goto fail_log;
		}
	}

	(*passes)++;
	printf("OK\n");
	printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ?
	       " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : "");
close_fds:
	close(fd_prog);
	close(fd_f1);