Loading fs/cifs/link.c +4 −6 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -592,11 +592,7 @@ cifs_hardlink(struct dentry *old_file, struct inode *inode, spin_lock(&old_file->d_inode->i_lock); inc_nlink(old_file->d_inode); spin_unlock(&old_file->d_inode->i_lock); /* * BB should we make this contingent on superblock flag * NOATIME? */ /* old_file->d_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; */ /* * parent dir timestamps will update from srv within a * second, would it really be worth it to set the parent Loading @@ -606,7 +602,9 @@ cifs_hardlink(struct dentry *old_file, struct inode *inode, } /* * if not oplocked will force revalidate to get info on source * file from srv * file from srv. Note Samba server prior to 4.2 has bug - * not updating src file ctime on hardlinks but Windows servers * handle it properly */ cifsInode->time = 0; Loading Loading
fs/cifs/link.c +4 −6 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -592,11 +592,7 @@ cifs_hardlink(struct dentry *old_file, struct inode *inode, spin_lock(&old_file->d_inode->i_lock); inc_nlink(old_file->d_inode); spin_unlock(&old_file->d_inode->i_lock); /* * BB should we make this contingent on superblock flag * NOATIME? */ /* old_file->d_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; */ /* * parent dir timestamps will update from srv within a * second, would it really be worth it to set the parent Loading @@ -606,7 +602,9 @@ cifs_hardlink(struct dentry *old_file, struct inode *inode, } /* * if not oplocked will force revalidate to get info on source * file from srv * file from srv. Note Samba server prior to 4.2 has bug - * not updating src file ctime on hardlinks but Windows servers * handle it properly */ cifsInode->time = 0; Loading