Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit fcd05b50 authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Martin Schwidefsky
Browse files

s390/kprobes: have more correct if statement in s390_get_insn_slot() 



When checking the insn address wether it is a kernel image or module
address it should be an if-else-if statement not two independent if
statements.
This doesn't really fix a bug, but matches s390_free_insn_slot().

Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent faf499df

arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int __kprobes s390_get_insn_slot(struct kprobe *p) 
	p->ainsn.insn = NULL;

	if (is_kernel_addr(p->addr))

		p->ainsn.insn = get_dmainsn_slot();

	if (is_module_addr(p->addr))

	else if (is_module_addr(p->addr))

		p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();

	return p->ainsn.insn ? 0 : -ENOMEM;

}