Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit e678a4f0 authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara
Browse files

jbd: don't wait (forever) for stale tid caused by wraparound



In the case where an inode has a very stale transaction id (tid) in
i_datasync_tid or i_sync_tid, it's possible that after a very large
(2**31) number of transactions, that the tid number space might wrap,
causing tid_geq()'s calculations to fail.

Commit d9b01934 "jbd: fix fsync() tid wraparound bug" attempted to fix
this problem, but it only avoided kjournald spinning forever by fixing
the logic in jbd_log_start_commit().

Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent e6436921
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+11 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -564,6 +564,16 @@ int log_wait_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid)
	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
#endif
	spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
	/*
	 * Not running or committing trans? Must be already committed. This
	 * saves us from waiting for a *long* time when tid overflows.
	 */
	if (!((journal->j_running_transaction &&
	       journal->j_running_transaction->t_tid == tid) ||
	      (journal->j_committing_transaction &&
	       journal->j_committing_transaction->t_tid == tid)))
		goto out_unlock;

	if (!tid_geq(journal->j_commit_waited, tid))
		journal->j_commit_waited = tid;
	while (tid_gt(tid, journal->j_commit_sequence)) {
@@ -575,6 +585,7 @@ int log_wait_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid)
				!tid_gt(tid, journal->j_commit_sequence));
		spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
	}
out_unlock:
	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);

	if (unlikely(is_journal_aborted(journal))) {