Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 8bc21841 authored by Raphael Assenat's avatar Raphael Assenat Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

[PATCH] mbxfb: Fix a chip bug? resulting in wrong pixclock



This is a workaround for what I think is a bug in the 2700G chip.

The PLL output frequency is adustable using 3 values (M, N and P.  See code
for formula).  The N value range is documented to be 1 to 7 but when it is set
to 1, the output frequency is lower than it should be (divided by 2), giving
unexpected results such as no sync on a CRT display.

This patch prevents N=1 when searching for the best value for the requested
pixclock.

Signed-off-by: default avatarRaphael Assenat <raph@8d.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAntonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 9c5b39e0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+12 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -118,8 +118,19 @@ static unsigned int mbxfb_get_pixclock(unsigned int pixclock_ps,
	/* convert pixclock to KHz */
	pixclock = PICOS2KHZ(pixclock_ps);

	/* PLL output freq = (ref_clk * M) / (N * 2^P)
	 *
	 * M: 1 to 63
	 * N: 1 to 7
	 * P: 0 to 7
	 */

	/* RAPH: When N==1, the resulting pixel clock appears to
	 * get divided by 2. Preventing N=1 by starting the following
	 * loop at 2 prevents this. Is this a bug with my chip
	 * revision or something I dont understand? */
	for (m = 1; m < 64; m++) {
		for (n = 1; n < 8; n++) {
		for (n = 2; n < 8; n++) {
			for (p = 0; p < 8; p++) {
				clk = (ref_clk * m) / (n * (1 << p));
				err = (clk > pixclock) ? (clk - pixclock) :