+2
−5
+1
−2
Loading
Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more
In the pure assignment case, the earlier zeroing is still in effect. David S. Miller raised concerns if the ifs are there to avoid dirtying cachelines. I came to these conclusions: > We'll be dirty it anyway (now that I check), the first "real" statement > in tcp_rcv_established is: > > tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0; > > ...that'll land on the same dword. :-/ > > I suppose the blocks are there just because they had more complexity > inside when they had to calculate the eff_sacks too (maybe it would > have been better to just remove them in that drop-patch so you would > have had less head-ache :-)). Signed-off-by:Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>