Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 35f5cad8 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

[PATCH] revert "Optimize sys_times for a single thread process"



This patch reverts 'CONFIG_SMP && thread_group_empty()' optimization in
sys_times().  The reason is that the next patch breaks memory ordering which
is needed for that optimization.

tasklist_lock in sys_times() will be eliminated completely by further patch.

Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 6a14c5c9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -139,11 +139,7 @@ repeat:
	ptrace_unlink(p);
	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&p->ptrace_list) || !list_empty(&p->ptrace_children));
	__exit_signal(p);
	/*
	 * Note that the fastpath in sys_times depends on __exit_signal having
	 * updated the counters before a task is removed from the tasklist of
	 * the process by __unhash_process.
	 */

	__unhash_process(p);

	/*
+26 −60
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1202,43 +1202,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_times(struct tms __user * tbuf)
	 */
	if (tbuf) {
		struct tms tmp;
		cputime_t utime, stime, cutime, cstime;

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
		if (thread_group_empty(current)) {
			/*
			 * Single thread case without the use of any locks.
			 *
			 * We may race with release_task if two threads are
			 * executing. However, release task first adds up the
			 * counters (__exit_signal) before  removing the task
			 * from the process tasklist (__unhash_process).
			 * __exit_signal also acquires and releases the
			 * siglock which results in the proper memory ordering
			 * so that the list modifications are always visible
			 * after the counters have been updated.
			 *
			 * If the counters have been updated by the second thread
			 * but the thread has not yet been removed from the list
			 * then the other branch will be executing which will
			 * block on tasklist_lock until the exit handling of the
			 * other task is finished.
			 *
			 * This also implies that the sighand->siglock cannot
			 * be held by another processor. So we can also
			 * skip acquiring that lock.
			 */
			utime = cputime_add(current->signal->utime, current->utime);
			stime = cputime_add(current->signal->utime, current->stime);
			cutime = current->signal->cutime;
			cstime = current->signal->cstime;
		} else
#endif
		{

			/* Process with multiple threads */
		struct task_struct *tsk = current;
		struct task_struct *t;
		cputime_t utime, stime, cutime, cstime;

		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
		utime = tsk->signal->utime;
@@ -1264,7 +1230,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_times(struct tms __user * tbuf)
		cstime = tsk->signal->cstime;
		spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
		}

		tmp.tms_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(utime);
		tmp.tms_stime = cputime_to_clock_t(stime);
		tmp.tms_cutime = cputime_to_clock_t(cutime);