Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 17dc59ba authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara
Browse files

udf: Do not decrement i_blocks when freeing indirect extent block 



Indirect extent block is not accounted in i_blocks during allocation
thus we should not decrement i_blocks when we are freeing such block
during truncation.

Reported-by: default avatarSteve Nickel <snickel58@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent bff943af

fs/udf/truncate.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode *inode) 
				/* We managed to free all extents in the

				 * indirect extent - free it too */

				BUG_ON(!epos.bh);

				udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, &epos.block,

				udf_free_blocks(sb, NULL, &epos.block,

						0, indirect_ext_len);

			} else if (!epos.bh) {

				iinfo->i_lenAlloc = lenalloc;
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode *inode) 


	if (indirect_ext_len) {

		BUG_ON(!epos.bh);

		udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, &epos.block, 0, indirect_ext_len);

		udf_free_blocks(sb, NULL, &epos.block, 0, indirect_ext_len);

	} else if (!epos.bh) {

		iinfo->i_lenAlloc = lenalloc;

		mark_inode_dirty(inode);