Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit c4bfa3f5 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Thomas Gleixner
Browse files

seqcount: Introduce raw_write_seqcount_barrier()



Introduce raw_write_seqcount_barrier(), a new construct that can be
used to provide write barrier semantics in seqcount read loops instead
of the usual consistency guarantee.

raw_write_seqcount_barier() is equivalent to:

	raw_write_seqcount_begin();
	raw_write_seqcount_end();

But avoids issueing two back-to-back smp_wmb() instructions.

This construct works because the read side will 'stall' when observing
odd values. This means that -- referring to the example in the comment
below -- even though there is no (matching) read barrier between the
loads of X and Y, we cannot observe !x && !y, because:

 - if we observe Y == false we must observe the first sequence
   increment, which makes us loop, until

 - we observe !(seq & 1) -- the second sequence increment -- at which
   time we must also observe T == true.

Suggested-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150617122924.GP3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net


Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent a7c6f571
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+41 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -233,6 +233,47 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
	s->sequence++;
}

/**
 * raw_write_seqcount_barrier - do a seq write barrier
 * @s: pointer to seqcount_t
 *
 * This can be used to provide an ordering guarantee instead of the
 * usual consistency guarantee. It is one wmb cheaper, because we can
 * collapse the two back-to-back wmb()s.
 *
 *      seqcount_t seq;
 *      bool X = true, Y = false;
 *
 *      void read(void)
 *      {
 *              bool x, y;
 *
 *              do {
 *                      int s = read_seqcount_begin(&seq);
 *
 *                      x = X; y = Y;
 *
 *              } while (read_seqcount_retry(&seq, s));
 *
 *              BUG_ON(!x && !y);
 *      }
 *
 *      void write(void)
 *      {
 *              Y = true;
 *
 *              raw_write_seqcount_barrier(seq);
 *
 *              X = false;
 *      }
 */
static inline void raw_write_seqcount_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
{
	s->sequence++;
	smp_wmb();
	s->sequence++;
}

/*
 * raw_write_seqcount_latch - redirect readers to even/odd copy
 * @s: pointer to seqcount_t