Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit a8ceb5db authored by Michael S. Tsirkin's avatar Michael S. Tsirkin Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

ptr_ring: add barriers



Users of ptr_ring expect that it's safe to give the
data structure a pointer and have it be available
to consumers, but that actually requires an smb_wmb
or a stronger barrier.

In absence of such barriers and on architectures that reorder writes,
consumer might read an un=initialized value from an skb pointer stored
in the skb array.  This was observed causing crashes.

To fix, add memory barriers.  The barrier we use is a wmb, the
assumption being that producers do not need to read the value so we do
not need to order these reads.

Reported-by: default avatarGeorge Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarJason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f0f1d016
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+9 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -101,12 +101,18 @@ static inline bool ptr_ring_full_bh(struct ptr_ring *r)

/* Note: callers invoking this in a loop must use a compiler barrier,
 * for example cpu_relax(). Callers must hold producer_lock.
 * Callers are responsible for making sure pointer that is being queued
 * points to a valid data.
 */
static inline int __ptr_ring_produce(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr)
{
	if (unlikely(!r->size) || r->queue[r->producer])
		return -ENOSPC;

	/* Make sure the pointer we are storing points to a valid data. */
	/* Pairs with smp_read_barrier_depends in __ptr_ring_consume. */
	smp_wmb();

	r->queue[r->producer++] = ptr;
	if (unlikely(r->producer >= r->size))
		r->producer = 0;
@@ -275,6 +281,9 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct ptr_ring *r)
	if (ptr)
		__ptr_ring_discard_one(r);

	/* Make sure anyone accessing data through the pointer is up to date. */
	/* Pairs with smp_wmb in __ptr_ring_produce. */
	smp_read_barrier_depends();
	return ptr;
}