Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 8c1903d3 authored by Dave Chinner's avatar Dave Chinner Committed by Dave Chinner
Browse files

xfs: inode and free block counters need to use __percpu_counter_compare



Because the counters use a custom batch size, the comparison
functions need to be aware of that batch size otherwise the
comparison does not work correctly. This leads to ASSERT failures
on generic/027 like this:

 XFS: Assertion failed: 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c, line: 1099
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
....
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81522a39>] xfs_mod_icount+0x99/0xc0
  [<ffffffff815285cb>] xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb+0x28b/0x5b0
  [<ffffffff8152f941>] xfs_log_commit_cil+0x321/0x580
  [<ffffffff81528e17>] xfs_trans_commit+0xb7/0x260
  [<ffffffff81503d4d>] xfs_bmap_finish+0xcd/0x1b0
  [<ffffffff8151da41>] xfs_inactive_ifree+0x1e1/0x250
  [<ffffffff8151dbe0>] xfs_inactive+0x130/0x200
  [<ffffffff81523a21>] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0x91/0xf0
  [<ffffffff811f3958>] evict+0xb8/0x190
  [<ffffffff811f433b>] iput+0x18b/0x1f0
  [<ffffffff811e8853>] do_unlinkat+0x1f3/0x320
  [<ffffffff811d548a>] ? filp_close+0x5a/0x80
  [<ffffffff811e999b>] SyS_unlinkat+0x1b/0x40
  [<ffffffff81e0892e>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71

This is a regression introduced by commit 501ab323 ("xfs: use generic
percpu counters for inode counter").

This patch fixes the same problem for both the inode counter and the
free block counter in the superblocks.

Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
parent 80188b0d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+20 −14
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1084,14 +1084,18 @@ xfs_log_sbcount(xfs_mount_t *mp)
	return xfs_sync_sb(mp, true);
}

/*
 * Deltas for the inode count are +/-64, hence we use a large batch size
 * of 128 so we don't need to take the counter lock on every update.
 */
#define XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH	128
int
xfs_mod_icount(
	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
	int64_t			delta)
{
	/* deltas are +/-64, hence the large batch size of 128. */
	__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, delta, 128);
	if (percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0) < 0) {
	__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH) < 0) {
		ASSERT(0);
		percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, -delta);
		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1113,6 +1117,14 @@ xfs_mod_ifree(
	return 0;
}

/*
 * Deltas for the block count can vary from 1 to very large, but lock contention
 * only occurs on frequent small block count updates such as in the delayed
 * allocation path for buffered writes (page a time updates). Hence we set
 * a large batch count (1024) to minimise global counter updates except when
 * we get near to ENOSPC and we have to be very accurate with our updates.
 */
#define XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH	1024
int
xfs_mod_fdblocks(
	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
@@ -1151,25 +1163,19 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
	 * Taking blocks away, need to be more accurate the closer we
	 * are to zero.
	 *
	 * batch size is set to a maximum of 1024 blocks - if we are
	 * allocating of freeing extents larger than this then we aren't
	 * going to be hammering the counter lock so a lock per update
	 * is not a problem.
	 *
	 * If the counter has a value of less than 2 * max batch size,
	 * then make everything serialise as we are real close to
	 * ENOSPC.
	 */
#define __BATCH	1024
	if (percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, 2 * __BATCH) < 0)
	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, 2 * XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH,
				     XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) < 0)
		batch = 1;
	else
		batch = __BATCH;
#undef __BATCH
		batch = XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH;

	__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
	if (percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks,
				   XFS_ALLOC_SET_ASIDE(mp)) >= 0) {
	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, XFS_ALLOC_SET_ASIDE(mp),
				     XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >= 0) {
		/* we had space! */
		return 0;
	}