Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 29200c19 authored by Josef Bacik's avatar Josef Bacik Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

bpf: test for AND edge cases



These two tests are based on the work done for f23cc643.  The first test is
just a basic one to make sure we don't allow AND'ing negative values, even if it
would result in a valid index for the array.  The second is a cleaned up version
of the original testcase provided by Jann Horn that resulted in the commit.

Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 9172d2a0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+55 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -4370,6 +4370,61 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
		.result = ACCEPT,
		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
	},
	{
		"invalid and of negative number",
		.insns = {
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 6),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, -4),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 2),
			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0,
				   offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	},
	{
		"invalid range check",
		.insns = {
			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 12),
			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 1),
			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_1, 2),
			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_9, 1),
			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_9, 1),
			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 1),
			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_9),
			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_3, 0x10000000),
			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3),
			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0),
			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
		},
		.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
		.result = REJECT,
		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
	}
};

static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)