Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit b80a2bfc authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Thomas Gleixner
Browse files

stop_machine: Reflow cpu_stop_queue_two_works()



The code flow in cpu_stop_queue_two_works() is a little arcane; fix this by
lifting the preempt_disable() to the top to create more natural nesting wrt
the spinlocks and make the wake_up_q() and preempt_enable() unconditional
at the end.

Furthermore, enable preemption in the -EDEADLK case, such that we spin-wait
with preemption enabled.

Suggested-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: isaacm@codeaurora.org
Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Cc: psodagud@codeaurora.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730112140.GH2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
parent b6a60cf3
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+23 −18
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -236,13 +236,24 @@ static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
	struct cpu_stopper *stopper2 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu2);
	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wakeq);
	int err;

retry:
	/*
	 * The waking up of stopper threads has to happen in the same
	 * scheduling context as the queueing.  Otherwise, there is a
	 * possibility of one of the above stoppers being woken up by another
	 * CPU, and preempting us. This will cause us to not wake up the other
	 * stopper forever.
	 */
	preempt_disable();
	raw_spin_lock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
	raw_spin_lock_nested(&stopper2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);

	if (!stopper1->enabled || !stopper2->enabled) {
		err = -ENOENT;
	if (!stopper1->enabled || !stopper2->enabled)
		goto unlock;
	}

	/*
	 * Ensure that if we race with __stop_cpus() the stoppers won't get
	 * queued up in reverse order leading to system deadlock.
@@ -253,36 +264,30 @@ static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
	 * It can be falsely true but it is safe to spin until it is cleared,
	 * queue_stop_cpus_work() does everything under preempt_disable().
	 */
	if (unlikely(stop_cpus_in_progress)) {
		err = -EDEADLK;
	if (unlikely(stop_cpus_in_progress))
		goto unlock;
	}

	err = 0;
	__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1, &wakeq);
	__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2, &wakeq);
	/*
	 * The waking up of stopper threads has to happen
	 * in the same scheduling context as the queueing.
	 * Otherwise, there is a possibility of one of the
	 * above stoppers being woken up by another CPU,
	 * and preempting us. This will cause us to n ot
	 * wake up the other stopper forever.
	 */
	preempt_disable();

unlock:
	raw_spin_unlock(&stopper2->lock);
	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&stopper1->lock);

	if (unlikely(err == -EDEADLK)) {
		preempt_enable();

		while (stop_cpus_in_progress)
			cpu_relax();

		goto retry;
	}

	if (!err) {
	wake_up_q(&wakeq);
	preempt_enable();
	}

	return err;
}