Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 8b592656 authored by Johannes Weiner's avatar Johannes Weiner Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop



uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can take
regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton lists where
a single page is passed via the page->lru list node.

This can sometimes lead to confusion as well as suggestions to replace
the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent b6e6edcf
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+4 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -5420,6 +5420,10 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
	struct list_head *next;
	struct page *page;

	/*
	 * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
	 * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
	 */
	next = page_list->next;
	do {
		unsigned int nr_pages = 1;