Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 0af99b13 authored by Venki Pallipadi's avatar Venki Pallipadi Committed by Dave Jones
Browse files

[CPUFREQ] ondemand: add a check to avoid negative load calculation



Due to rounding and inexact jiffy accounting, idle_ticks can sometimes
be higher than total_ticks. Make sure those cases are handled as
zero load case.

Signed-off-by: default avatarVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
parent c7f652e0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static struct attribute_group dbs_attr_group = {
static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info)
{
	unsigned int idle_ticks, total_ticks;
	unsigned int load;
	unsigned int load = 0;
	cputime64_t cur_jiffies;

	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info)
		if (tmp_idle_ticks < idle_ticks)
			idle_ticks = tmp_idle_ticks;
	}
	if (likely(total_ticks > idle_ticks))
		load = (100 * (total_ticks - idle_ticks)) / total_ticks;

	/* Check for frequency increase */