Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit c2368e79 authored by Simon Horman's avatar Simon Horman Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()? 



While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse
Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code.
I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code.

Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSimon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent fcb12fd2

net/bridge/br_input.c

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb) 
	const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;

	int (*rhook)(struct sk_buff *skb);



	if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK)

	if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))

		return skb;



	if (!is_valid_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source))