Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit bee0393c authored by Shaohua Li's avatar Shaohua Li Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

block: recursive merge requests



In a workload, thread 1 accesses a, a+2, ..., thread 2 accesses a+1, a+3,....
When the requests are flushed to queue, a and a+1 are merged to (a, a+1), a+2
and a+3 too to (a+2, a+3), but (a, a+1) and (a+2, a+3) aren't merged.

If we do recursive merge for such interleave access, some workloads throughput
get improvement. A recent worload I'm checking on is swap, below change
boostes the throughput around 5% ~ 10%.

Signed-off-by: default avatarShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 3d106fba
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+12 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ static bool elv_attempt_insert_merge(struct request_queue *q,
				     struct request *rq)
{
	struct request *__rq;
	bool ret;

	if (blk_queue_nomerges(q))
		return false;
@@ -471,14 +472,21 @@ static bool elv_attempt_insert_merge(struct request_queue *q,
	if (blk_queue_noxmerges(q))
		return false;

	ret = false;
	/*
	 * See if our hash lookup can find a potential backmerge.
	 */
	while (1) {
		__rq = elv_rqhash_find(q, blk_rq_pos(rq));
	if (__rq && blk_attempt_req_merge(q, __rq, rq))
		return true;
		if (!__rq || !blk_attempt_req_merge(q, __rq, rq))
			break;

	return false;
		/* The merged request could be merged with others, try again */
		ret = true;
		rq = __rq;
	}

	return ret;
}

void elv_merged_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, int type)