Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 92d4dda3 authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by Paul Mackerras
Browse files

[POWERPC] Fix comment in kernel/irq.c



kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt
numbers, but this is actually dependent on configuration options now.
Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_ENABLED.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
parent f31909c0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)

	/*
	 * Every platform is required to implement ppc_md.get_irq.
	 * This function will either return an irq number or -1 to
	 * This function will either return an irq number or NO_IRQ to
	 * indicate there are no more pending.
	 * The value -2 is for buggy hardware and means that this IRQ
	 * has already been handled. -- Tom
	 * The value NO_IRQ_IGNORE is for buggy hardware and means that this
	 * IRQ has already been handled. -- Tom
	 */
	irq = ppc_md.get_irq();