Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 0765cbd3 authored by Stefan Richter's avatar Stefan Richter
Browse files

firewire: sbp2: protect a reference counter properly



The assertion in the comment in sbp2_allow_block() is no longer true.
Or maybe it never was true.  At least now, the sole caller of
sbp2_allow_block(), sbp2_login, can run concurrently to one of
sbp2_unblock()'s callers, sbp2_remove.

sbp2_login is performed by sbp2_logical_unit.work.
sbp2_remove is performed by fw_device.work.
sbp2_remove cancels sbp2_logical_unit.work, but only after it called
sbp2_unblock.

Signed-off-by: default avatarStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
parent 0238507b
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+6 −8
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -689,14 +689,12 @@ static void sbp2_agent_reset_no_wait(struct sbp2_logical_unit *lu)

static inline void sbp2_allow_block(struct sbp2_logical_unit *lu)
{
	/*
	 * We may access dont_block without taking card->lock here:
	 * All callers of sbp2_allow_block() and all callers of sbp2_unblock()
	 * are currently serialized against each other.
	 * And a wrong result in sbp2_conditionally_block()'s access of
	 * dont_block is rather harmless, it simply misses its first chance.
	 */
	--lu->tgt->dont_block;
	struct sbp2_target *tgt = lu->tgt;
	struct fw_card *card = target_parent_device(tgt)->card;

	spin_lock_irq(&card->lock);
	--tgt->dont_block;
	spin_unlock_irq(&card->lock);
}

/*