Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit fdef7aa5 authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields
Browse files

svcrpc: ensure cache_check caller sees updated entry



Supposes cache_check runs simultaneously with an update on a different
CPU:

	cache_check			task doing update
	^^^^^^^^^^^			^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	1. test for CACHE_VALID		1'. set entry->data
	   & !CACHE_NEGATIVE

	2. use entry->data		2'. set CACHE_VALID

If the two memory writes performed in step 1' and 2' appear misordered
with respect to the reads in step 1 and 2, then the caller could get
stale data at step 2 even though it saw CACHE_VALID set on the cache
entry.

Add memory barriers to prevent this.

Reviewed-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent 6bab93f8
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
{
	head->expiry_time = expiry;
	head->last_refresh = seconds_since_boot();
	smp_wmb(); /* paired with smp_rmb() in cache_is_valid() */
	set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
}

@@ -208,10 +209,18 @@ static inline int cache_is_valid(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head
		/* entry is valid */
		if (test_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags))
			return -ENOENT;
		else
		else {
			/*
			 * In combination with write barrier in
			 * sunrpc_cache_update, ensures that anyone
			 * using the cache entry after this sees the
			 * updated contents:
			 */
			smp_rmb();
			return 0;
		}
	}
}

static int try_to_negate_entry(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h)
{