Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 95b19f68 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Paul E. McKenney
Browse files

locking/percpu-rwsem: Make percpu_free_rwsem() after kzalloc() safe



This is the temporary ugly hack which will be reverted later. We only
need it to ensure that the next patch will not break "change sb_writers
to use percpu_rw_semaphore" patches routed via the VFS tree.

The alloc_super()->destroy_super() error path assumes that it is safe
to call percpu_free_rwsem() after kzalloc() without percpu_init_rwsem(),
so let's not disappoint it.

Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
parent 07899a6e
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+7 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -26,6 +26,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_init_rwsem);

void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
{
	/*
	 * XXX: temporary kludge. The error path in alloc_super()
	 * assumes that percpu_free_rwsem() is safe after kzalloc().
	 */
	if (!brw->fast_read_ctr)
		return;

	free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr);
	brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
}