+0
−20
Loading
Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more
There is still considerable confusion as to the semantics of spin_unlock_wait(), but there seems to be universal agreement that it is not that of a lock/unlock pair. This commit therefore removes the comment added by 6016ffc3 ("atomics: Add header comment so spin_unlock_wait()") in order to prevent at least that flavor of confusion. Signed-off-by:Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>