Commit 729b8a3d authored Jan 29, 2015 by David Howells Committed by Al Viro Feb 22, 2015

Apparmor: Use d_is_positive/negative() rather than testing dentry->d_inode

Use d_is_positive(dentry) or d_is_negative(dentry) rather than testing
dentry->d_inode as the dentry may cover another layer that has an inode when
the top layer doesn't or may hold a 0,0 chardev that's actually a whiteout.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

parent 7ac2856d

security/apparmor/path.c

+1 −1

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int d_namespace_path(struct path path, char buf, int buflen,
		* security_path hooks as a deleted dentry except without an inode
		* allocated.
		*/
		if (d_unlinked(path->dentry) && path->dentry->d_inode &&
		if (d_unlinked(path->dentry) && d_is_positive(path->dentry) &&
		!(flags & PATH_MEDIATE_DELETED)) {
		error = -ENOENT;
		goto out;