Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 71a29aa7 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

sched: Deal with low-load in wake_affine()



wake_affine() would always fail under low-load situations where
both prev and this were idle, because adding a single task will
always be a significant imbalance, even if there's nothing
around that could balance it.

Deal with this by allowing imbalance when there's nothing you
can do about it.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent cdd2ab3d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+11 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1262,7 +1262,17 @@ wake_affine(struct sched_domain *this_sd, struct rq *this_rq,
	tg = task_group(p);
	weight = p->se.load.weight;

	balanced = 100*(tl + effective_load(tg, this_cpu, weight, weight)) <=
	/*
	 * In low-load situations, where prev_cpu is idle and this_cpu is idle
	 * due to the sync cause above having dropped tl to 0, we'll always have
	 * an imbalance, but there's really nothing you can do about that, so
	 * that's good too.
	 *
	 * Otherwise check if either cpus are near enough in load to allow this
	 * task to be woken on this_cpu.
	 */
	balanced = !tl ||
		100*(tl + effective_load(tg, this_cpu, weight, weight)) <=
		imbalance*(load + effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, weight));

	/*