Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit f498926c authored by Masahiro Yamada's avatar Masahiro Yamada
Browse files

kconfig: improve the recursive dependency report



This commit improves the messages of the recursive dependency.
Currently, sym->dir_dep.expr is not checked.  Hence, any dependency
in property visibility is regarded as the dependency of the symbol.

[Test Code 1]

  config A
          bool "a"
          depends on B

  config B
          bool "b"
          depends on A

[Test Code 2]

  config A
          bool "a" if B

  config B
          bool "b"
          depends on A

For both cases above, the same message is displayed:

        symbol B depends on A
        symbol A depends on B

This commit changes the message for the latter, like this:

        symbol B depends on A
        symbol A prompt is visible depending on B

Also, 'select' and 'imply' are distinguished.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Tested-by: default avatarDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>
parent 5e8c5299
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+34 −14
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ static struct dep_stack {
	struct dep_stack *prev, *next;
	struct symbol *sym;
	struct property *prop;
	struct expr *expr;
	struct expr **expr;
} *check_top;

static void dep_stack_insert(struct dep_stack *stack, struct symbol *sym)
@@ -1076,31 +1076,42 @@ static void sym_check_print_recursive(struct symbol *last_sym)
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:error: recursive dependency detected!\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno);

		if (stack->expr) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s %s value contains %s\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno,
		if (sym_is_choice(sym)) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tchoice %s contains symbol %s\n",
				menu->file->name, menu->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				prop_get_type_name(prop->type),
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		} else if (stack->prop) {
		} else if (sym_is_choice_value(sym)) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is part of choice %s\n",
				menu->file->name, menu->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		} else if (stack->expr == &sym->dir_dep.expr) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s depends on %s\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		} else if (sym_is_choice(sym)) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tchoice %s contains symbol %s\n",
				menu->file->name, menu->lineno,
		} else if (stack->expr == &sym->rev_dep.expr) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is selected by %s\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		} else if (sym_is_choice_value(sym)) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is part of choice %s\n",
				menu->file->name, menu->lineno,
		} else if (stack->expr == &sym->implied.expr) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is implied by %s\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		} else if (stack->expr) {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s %s value contains %s\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				prop_get_type_name(prop->type),
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		} else {
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is selected or implied by %s\n",
			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s %s is visible depending on %s\n",
				prop->file->name, prop->lineno,
				sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
				prop_get_type_name(prop->type),
				next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
		}
	}
@@ -1157,14 +1168,23 @@ static struct symbol *sym_check_sym_deps(struct symbol *sym)

	dep_stack_insert(&stack, sym);

	stack.expr = &sym->dir_dep.expr;
	sym2 = sym_check_expr_deps(sym->dir_dep.expr);
	if (sym2)
		goto out;

	stack.expr = &sym->rev_dep.expr;
	sym2 = sym_check_expr_deps(sym->rev_dep.expr);
	if (sym2)
		goto out;

	stack.expr = &sym->implied.expr;
	sym2 = sym_check_expr_deps(sym->implied.expr);
	if (sym2)
		goto out;

	stack.expr = NULL;

	for (prop = sym->prop; prop; prop = prop->next) {
		if (prop->type == P_CHOICE || prop->type == P_SELECT ||
		    prop->type == P_IMPLY)
@@ -1175,7 +1195,7 @@ static struct symbol *sym_check_sym_deps(struct symbol *sym)
			break;
		if (prop->type != P_DEFAULT || sym_is_choice(sym))
			continue;
		stack.expr = prop->expr;
		stack.expr = &prop->expr;
		sym2 = sym_check_expr_deps(prop->expr);
		if (sym2)
			break;
+3 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
Kconfig:11:error: recursive dependency detected!
Kconfig:11:	symbol B is selected or implied by B
Kconfig:11:	symbol B is selected by B
For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"

@@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"

Kconfig:32:error: recursive dependency detected!
Kconfig:32:	symbol D2 is selected or implied by D1
Kconfig:32:	symbol D2 is selected by D1
Kconfig:27:	symbol D1 depends on D2
For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"

Kconfig:37:error: recursive dependency detected!
Kconfig:37:	symbol E1 depends on E2
Kconfig:42:	symbol E2 is selected or implied by E1
Kconfig:42:	symbol E2 is implied by E1
For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"