Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit dc98df5a authored by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki's avatar KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

memcg: oom wakeup filter



memcg's oom waitqueue is a system-wide wait_queue (for handling
hierarchy.) So, it's better to add custom wake function and do filtering
in wake up path.

This patch adds a filtering feature for waking up oom-waiters.  Hierarchy
is properly handled.

Signed-off-by: default avatarKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 595f4b69
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+46 −17
Original line number Original line Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1293,14 +1293,56 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_oom_mutex);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_oom_mutex);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(memcg_oom_waitq);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(memcg_oom_waitq);


struct oom_wait_info {
	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
	wait_queue_t	wait;
};

static int memcg_oom_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait,
	unsigned mode, int sync, void *arg)
{
	struct mem_cgroup *wake_mem = (struct mem_cgroup *)arg;
	struct oom_wait_info *oom_wait_info;

	oom_wait_info = container_of(wait, struct oom_wait_info, wait);

	if (oom_wait_info->mem == wake_mem)
		goto wakeup;
	/* if no hierarchy, no match */
	if (!oom_wait_info->mem->use_hierarchy || !wake_mem->use_hierarchy)
		return 0;
	/*
	 * Both of oom_wait_info->mem and wake_mem are stable under us.
	 * Then we can use css_is_ancestor without taking care of RCU.
	 */
	if (!css_is_ancestor(&oom_wait_info->mem->css, &wake_mem->css) &&
	    !css_is_ancestor(&wake_mem->css, &oom_wait_info->mem->css))
		return 0;

wakeup:
	return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, arg);
}

static void memcg_wakeup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
	/* for filtering, pass "mem" as argument. */
	__wake_up(&memcg_oom_waitq, TASK_NORMAL, 0, mem);
}

/*
/*
 * try to call OOM killer. returns false if we should exit memory-reclaim loop.
 * try to call OOM killer. returns false if we should exit memory-reclaim loop.
 */
 */
bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
{
{
	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
	struct oom_wait_info owait;
	bool locked;
	bool locked;


	owait.mem = mem;
	owait.wait.flags = 0;
	owait.wait.func = memcg_oom_wake_function;
	owait.wait.private = current;
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&owait.wait.task_list);

	/* At first, try to OOM lock hierarchy under mem.*/
	/* At first, try to OOM lock hierarchy under mem.*/
	mutex_lock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
	mutex_lock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
	locked = mem_cgroup_oom_lock(mem);
	locked = mem_cgroup_oom_lock(mem);
@@ -1310,31 +1352,18 @@ bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t mask)
	 * under OOM is always welcomed, use TASK_KILLABLE here.
	 * under OOM is always welcomed, use TASK_KILLABLE here.
	 */
	 */
	if (!locked)
	if (!locked)
		prepare_to_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &wait, TASK_KILLABLE);
		prepare_to_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE);
	mutex_unlock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
	mutex_unlock(&memcg_oom_mutex);


	if (locked)
	if (locked)
		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem, mask);
		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem, mask);
	else {
	else {
		schedule();
		schedule();
		finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &wait);
		finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
	}
	}
	mutex_lock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
	mutex_lock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
	mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(mem);
	mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(mem);
	/*
	memcg_wakeup_oom(mem);
	 * Here, we use global waitq .....more fine grained waitq ?
	 * Assume following hierarchy.
	 * A/
	 *   01
	 *   02
	 * assume OOM happens both in A and 01 at the same time. Tthey are
	 * mutually exclusive by lock. (kill in 01 helps A.)
	 * When we use per memcg waitq, we have to wake up waiters on A and 02
	 * in addtion to waiters on 01. We use global waitq for avoiding mess.
	 * It will not be a big problem.
	 * (And a task may be moved to other groups while it's waiting for OOM.)
	 */
	wake_up_all(&memcg_oom_waitq);
	mutex_unlock(&memcg_oom_mutex);
	mutex_unlock(&memcg_oom_mutex);


	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) || fatal_signal_pending(current))
	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) || fatal_signal_pending(current))