Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 804b269c authored by Darrick J. Wong's avatar Darrick J. Wong Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

xfs: fix the minrecs logic when dealing with inode root child blocks



[ Upstream commit e95b6c3ef1311dd7b20467d932a24b6d0fd88395 ]

The comment and logic in xchk_btree_check_minrecs for dealing with
inode-rooted btrees isn't quite correct.  While the direct children of
the inode root are allowed to have fewer records than what would
normally be allowed for a regular ondisk btree block, this is only true
if there is only one child block and the number of records don't fit in
the inode root.

Fixes: 08a3a692 ("xfs: btree scrub should check minrecs")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent 789cbe71
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+27 −18
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -450,32 +450,41 @@ xchk_btree_check_minrecs(
	int			level,
	struct xfs_btree_block	*block)
{
	unsigned int		numrecs;
	int			ok_level;

	numrecs = be16_to_cpu(block->bb_numrecs);
	struct xfs_btree_cur	*cur = bs->cur;
	unsigned int		root_level = cur->bc_nlevels - 1;
	unsigned int		numrecs = be16_to_cpu(block->bb_numrecs);

	/* More records than minrecs means the block is ok. */
	if (numrecs >= bs->cur->bc_ops->get_minrecs(bs->cur, level))
	if (numrecs >= cur->bc_ops->get_minrecs(cur, level))
		return;

	/*
	 * Certain btree blocks /can/ have fewer than minrecs records.  Any
	 * level greater than or equal to the level of the highest dedicated
	 * btree block are allowed to violate this constraint.
	 *
	 * For a btree rooted in a block, the btree root can have fewer than
	 * minrecs records.  If the btree is rooted in an inode and does not
	 * store records in the root, the direct children of the root and the
	 * root itself can have fewer than minrecs records.
	 * For btrees rooted in the inode, it's possible that the root block
	 * contents spilled into a regular ondisk block because there wasn't
	 * enough space in the inode root.  The number of records in that
	 * child block might be less than the standard minrecs, but that's ok
	 * provided that there's only one direct child of the root.
	 */
	ok_level = bs->cur->bc_nlevels - 1;
	if (bs->cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE)
		ok_level--;
	if (level >= ok_level)
	if ((cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE) &&
	    level == cur->bc_nlevels - 2) {
		struct xfs_btree_block	*root_block;
		struct xfs_buf		*root_bp;
		int			root_maxrecs;

		root_block = xfs_btree_get_block(cur, root_level, &root_bp);
		root_maxrecs = cur->bc_ops->get_dmaxrecs(cur, root_level);
		if (be16_to_cpu(root_block->bb_numrecs) != 1 ||
		    numrecs <= root_maxrecs)
			xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, cur, level);
		return;
	}

	xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, level);
	/*
	 * Otherwise, only the root level is allowed to have fewer than minrecs
	 * records or keyptrs.
	 */
	if (level < root_level)
		xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, cur, level);
}

/*