Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 64bb336c authored by Casey Leedom's avatar Casey Leedom Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

cxgb4vf: Remove obsolete comment about the lack of a TX Timer Callback



Remove obsolete comment about the lack of a TX Timer Callback -- which
we now _do_ have ...

Signed-off-by: default avatarCasey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d6bebca9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −12
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1301,18 +1301,7 @@ int t4vf_eth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
		 * wait for acks to really free up the data the extra memory
		 * is even less.  On the positive side we run the destructors
		 * on the sending CPU rather than on a potentially different
		 * completing CPU, usually a good thing.  We also run them
		 * without holding our TX queue lock, unlike what
		 * reclaim_completed_tx() would otherwise do.
		 *
		 * XXX Actually the above is somewhat incorrect since we don't
		 * XXX yet have a periodic timer which reclaims TX Descriptors.
		 * XXX What's our plan for this?
		 * XXX
		 * XXX Also, we don't currently have a TX Queue lock but
		 * XXX that may be the result of not having any current
		 * XXX asynchronous path for reclaiming completed TX
		 * XXX Descriptors ...
		 * completing CPU, usually a good thing.
		 *
		 * Run the destructor before telling the DMA engine about the
		 * packet to make sure it doesn't complete and get freed