Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 3e777f99 authored by Steven Rostedt (VMware)'s avatar Steven Rostedt (VMware) Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

sched/rt: Add comments describing the RT IPI pull method



While looking into optimizations for the RT scheduler IPI logic, I realized
that the comments are lacking to describe it efficiently. It deserves a
lengthy description describing its design.

Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228155030.30c69068@gandalf.local.home


[ Small typographical edits. ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 2317d5f1
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+81 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1927,6 +1927,87 @@ static int find_next_push_cpu(struct rq *rq)
#define RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING		1
#define RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART		2

/*
 * When a high priority task schedules out from a CPU and a lower priority
 * task is scheduled in, a check is made to see if there's any RT tasks
 * on other CPUs that are waiting to run because a higher priority RT task
 * is currently running on its CPU. In this case, the CPU with multiple RT
 * tasks queued on it (overloaded) needs to be notified that a CPU has opened
 * up that may be able to run one of its non-running queued RT tasks.
 *
 * On large CPU boxes, there's the case that several CPUs could schedule
 * a lower priority task at the same time, in which case it will look for
 * any overloaded CPUs that it could pull a task from. To do this, the runqueue
 * lock must be taken from that overloaded CPU. Having 10s of CPUs all fighting
 * for a single overloaded CPU's runqueue lock can produce a large latency.
 * (This has actually been observed on large boxes running cyclictest).
 * Instead of taking the runqueue lock of the overloaded CPU, each of the
 * CPUs that scheduled a lower priority task simply sends an IPI to the
 * overloaded CPU. An IPI is much cheaper than taking an runqueue lock with
 * lots of contention. The overloaded CPU will look to push its non-running
 * RT task off, and if it does, it can then ignore the other IPIs coming
 * in, and just pass those IPIs off to any other overloaded CPU.
 *
 * When a CPU schedules a lower priority task, it only sends an IPI to
 * the "next" CPU that has overloaded RT tasks. This prevents IPI storms,
 * as having 10 CPUs scheduling lower priority tasks and 10 CPUs with
 * RT overloaded tasks, would cause 100 IPIs to go out at once.
 *
 * The overloaded RT CPU, when receiving an IPI, will try to push off its
 * overloaded RT tasks and then send an IPI to the next CPU that has
 * overloaded RT tasks. This stops when all CPUs with overloaded RT tasks
 * have completed. Just because a CPU may have pushed off its own overloaded
 * RT task does not mean it should stop sending the IPI around to other
 * overloaded CPUs. There may be another RT task waiting to run on one of
 * those CPUs that are of higher priority than the one that was just
 * pushed.
 *
 * An optimization that could possibly be made is to make a CPU array similar
 * to the cpupri array mask of all running RT tasks, but for the overloaded
 * case, then the IPI could be sent to only the CPU with the highest priority
 * RT task waiting, and that CPU could send off further IPIs to the CPU with
 * the next highest waiting task. Since the overloaded case is much less likely
 * to happen, the complexity of this implementation may not be worth it.
 * Instead, just send an IPI around to all overloaded CPUs.
 *
 * The rq->rt.push_flags holds the status of the IPI that is going around.
 * A run queue can only send out a single IPI at a time. The possible flags
 * for rq->rt.push_flags are:
 *
 *    (None or zero):		No IPI is going around for the current rq
 *    RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING:	An IPI for the rq is being passed around
 *    RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART:	The priority of the running task for the rq
 *				has changed, and the IPI should restart
 *				circulating the overloaded CPUs again.
 *
 * rq->rt.push_cpu contains the CPU that is being sent the IPI. It is updated
 * before sending to the next CPU.
 *
 * Instead of having all CPUs that schedule a lower priority task send
 * an IPI to the same "first" CPU in the RT overload mask, they send it
 * to the next overloaded CPU after their own CPU. This helps distribute
 * the work when there's more than one overloaded CPU and multiple CPUs
 * scheduling in lower priority tasks.
 *
 * When a rq schedules a lower priority task than what was currently
 * running, the next CPU with overloaded RT tasks is examined first.
 * That is, if CPU 1 and 5 are overloaded, and CPU 3 schedules a lower
 * priority task, it will send an IPI first to CPU 5, then CPU 5 will
 * send to CPU 1 if it is still overloaded. CPU 1 will clear the
 * rq->rt.push_flags if RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART is not set.
 *
 * The first CPU to notice IPI_RESTART is set, will clear that flag and then
 * send an IPI to the next overloaded CPU after the rq->cpu and not the next
 * CPU after push_cpu. That is, if CPU 1, 4 and 5 are overloaded when CPU 3
 * schedules a lower priority task, and the IPI_RESTART gets set while the
 * handling is being done on CPU 5, it will clear the flag and send it back to
 * CPU 4 instead of CPU 1.
 *
 * Note, the above logic can be disabled by turning off the sched_feature
 * RT_PUSH_IPI. Then the rq lock of the overloaded CPU will simply be
 * taken by the CPU requesting a pull and the waiting RT task will be pulled
 * by that CPU. This may be fine for machines with few CPUs.
 */
static void tell_cpu_to_push(struct rq *rq)
{
	int cpu;