Commit 0998a03a authored Oct 15, 2015 by Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki Oct 28, 2015

cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask



->related_cpus is empty at this point of time and copying ->cpus to it
or orring ->related_cpus with ->cpus would result in the same value. But
cpumask_copy makes it rather clear.

Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

parent 083701b1

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c

+1 −1

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)

		if (new_policy) {
		/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
		cpumask_or(policy->related_cpus, policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
		cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
		/* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
		cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
		}