Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit fb2081e8 authored by Martin Blumenstingl's avatar Martin Blumenstingl Committed by Thierry Reding
Browse files

pwm: meson: Simplify the calculation of the pre-divider and count



Replace the loop to calculate the pre-divider and count with two
separate div64_u64() calculations. This makes the code easier to read
and improves the precision.

Three example cases:
1) 32.768kHz LPO clock for the SDIO wifi chip on Khadas VIM
   clock input: 500MHz (FCLK_DIV4)
   period: 30518ns
   duty cycle: 15259ns
old algorithm: pre_div=0, cnt=15259
new algorithm: pre_div=0, cnt=15259
(no difference in calculated values)

2) PWM LED on Khadas VIM
   clock input: 24MHz (XTAL)
   period: 7812500ns
   duty cycle: 7812500ns
old algorithm: pre_div=2, cnt=62004
new algorithm: pre_div=2, cnt=62500
Using a scope (24MHz sampling rate) shows the actual difference:
- old: 7753000ns, off by -59500ns (0.7616%)
- new: 7815000ns, off by +2500ns (0.032%)

3) Theoretical case where pre_div is different
   clock input: 24MHz (XTAL)
   period: 2730624ns
   duty cycle: 1365312ns
old algorithm: pre_div=1, cnt=32768
new algorithm: pre_div=0, cnt=65534
Using a scope (24MHz sampling rate) shows the actual difference:
- old: 2731000ns
- new: 2731000ns
(my scope is not precise enough to measure the difference if there's
any)

Suggested-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNeil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
parent 1064c6ba
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −15
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
@@ -145,7 +146,6 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
	struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
	unsigned int duty, period, pre_div, cnt, duty_cnt;
	unsigned long fin_freq = -1;
	u64 fin_ps;

	duty = state->duty_cycle;
	period = state->period;
@@ -164,24 +164,19 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
	}

	dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "fin_freq: %lu Hz\n", fin_freq);
	fin_ps = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 1000;
	do_div(fin_ps, fin_freq);

	/* Calc pre_div with the period */
	for (pre_div = 0; pre_div <= MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK; pre_div++) {
		cnt = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)period * 1000,
					    fin_ps * (pre_div + 1));
		dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "fin_ps=%llu pre_div=%u cnt=%u\n",
			fin_ps, pre_div, cnt);
		if (cnt <= 0xffff)
			break;
	}

	pre_div = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * 0xffffLL);
	if (pre_div > MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK) {
		dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get period pre_div\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1));
	if (cnt > 0xffff) {
		dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get period cnt\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "period=%u pre_div=%u cnt=%u\n", period,
		pre_div, cnt);

@@ -195,8 +190,8 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
		channel->lo = cnt;
	} else {
		/* Then check is we can have the duty with the same pre_div */
		duty_cnt = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)duty * 1000,
						 fin_ps * (pre_div + 1));
		duty_cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)duty,
				     NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1));
		if (duty_cnt > 0xffff) {
			dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get duty cycle\n");
			return -EINVAL;