Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit e77e5481 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

list: add "list_del_init_careful()" to go with "list_empty_careful()"



[ Upstream commit c6fe44d96fc1536af5b11cd859686453d1b7bfd1 ]

That gives us ordering guarantees around the pair.

Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Stable-dep-of: 2192bba03d80 ("epoll: ep_autoremove_wake_function should use list_del_init_careful")
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent c32ab1c1
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+19 −1
Original line number Original line Diff line number Diff line
@@ -268,6 +268,24 @@ static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
	return READ_ONCE(head->next) == head;
	return READ_ONCE(head->next) == head;
}
}


/**
 * list_del_init_careful - deletes entry from list and reinitialize it.
 * @entry: the element to delete from the list.
 *
 * This is the same as list_del_init(), except designed to be used
 * together with list_empty_careful() in a way to guarantee ordering
 * of other memory operations.
 *
 * Any memory operations done before a list_del_init_careful() are
 * guaranteed to be visible after a list_empty_careful() test.
 */
static inline void list_del_init_careful(struct list_head *entry)
{
	__list_del_entry(entry);
	entry->prev = entry;
	smp_store_release(&entry->next, entry);
}

/**
/**
 * list_empty_careful - tests whether a list is empty and not being modified
 * list_empty_careful - tests whether a list is empty and not being modified
 * @head: the list to test
 * @head: the list to test
@@ -283,7 +301,7 @@ static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
 */
 */
static inline int list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
static inline int list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
{
{
	struct list_head *next = head->next;
	struct list_head *next = smp_load_acquire(&head->next);
	return (next == head) && (next == head->prev);
	return (next == head) && (next == head->prev);
}
}


+1 −1
Original line number Original line Diff line number Diff line
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int autoremove_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, i
	int ret = default_wake_function(wq_entry, mode, sync, key);
	int ret = default_wake_function(wq_entry, mode, sync, key);


	if (ret)
	if (ret)
		list_del_init(&wq_entry->entry);
		list_del_init_careful(&wq_entry->entry);


	return ret;
	return ret;
}
}
+1 −6
Original line number Original line Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1085,13 +1085,8 @@ static int wake_page_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
	 * since after list_del_init(&wait->entry) the wait entry
	 * since after list_del_init(&wait->entry) the wait entry
	 * might be de-allocated and the process might even have
	 * might be de-allocated and the process might even have
	 * exited.
	 * exited.
	 *
	 * We _really_ should have a "list_del_init_careful()" to
	 * properly pair with the unlocked "list_empty_careful()"
	 * in finish_wait().
	 */
	 */
	smp_mb();
	list_del_init_careful(&wait->entry);
	list_del_init(&wait->entry);
	return ret;
	return ret;
}
}