Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit be21683e authored by Max Gurtovoy's avatar Max Gurtovoy Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

block: t10-pi: fix -Wswitch warning



Changing the switch() statement to symbolic constants made the compiler
(at least clang-9, did not check gcc) notice that there is one enum value
that is not handled here:

block/t10-pi.c:62:11: error: enumeration value 'T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION'
not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]

Add a BUG_ON statement if we ever get to t10_pi_verify function with
TYPE0 and replace the switch() statement with if/else clause for the
valid types.

Fixes: 9b2061b1a262 ("block: use symbolic constants for t10_pi type")
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMax Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent eb09b3cc
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+5 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -55,13 +55,14 @@ static blk_status_t t10_pi_verify(struct blk_integrity_iter *iter,
{
	unsigned int i;

	BUG_ON(type == T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION);

	for (i = 0 ; i < iter->data_size ; i += iter->interval) {
		struct t10_pi_tuple *pi = iter->prot_buf;
		__be16 csum;

		switch (type) {
		case T10_PI_TYPE1_PROTECTION:
		case T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION:
		if (type == T10_PI_TYPE1_PROTECTION ||
		    type == T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION) {
			if (pi->app_tag == T10_PI_APP_ESCAPE)
				goto next;

@@ -73,12 +74,10 @@ static blk_status_t t10_pi_verify(struct blk_integrity_iter *iter,
				       iter->seed, be32_to_cpu(pi->ref_tag));
				return BLK_STS_PROTECTION;
			}
			break;
		case T10_PI_TYPE3_PROTECTION:
		} else if (type == T10_PI_TYPE3_PROTECTION) {
			if (pi->app_tag == T10_PI_APP_ESCAPE &&
			    pi->ref_tag == T10_PI_REF_ESCAPE)
				goto next;
			break;
		}

		csum = fn(iter->data_buf, iter->interval);