Commit 2311e327 authored Sep 17, 2016 by David Howells

rxrpc: Be consistent about switch value in rxrpc_send_call_packet()



rxrpc_send_call_packet() should use type in both its switch-statements
rather than using pkt->whdr.type.  This might give the compiler an easier
job of uninitialised variable checking.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

parent 27d0fc43

net/rxrpc/output.c

+1 −1

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_call_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 type)
		&msg, iov, ioc, len);

		if (ret < 0 && call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE) {
		switch (pkt->whdr.type) {
		switch (type) {
		case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACK:
		rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, pkt->ack.reason,
		ntohs(pkt->ack.maxSkew),